NLRB Grants Employers More Flexibility to Discipline Unruly Employees
Last week, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a unanimous decision that clarified the standard for when an employer can lawfully discipline an employee for making abusive or offensive statements during union-related activities. This ruling will help employers maintain a safe and respectful work environment.
The Decision
In issuing its decision, the NLRB abandoned its previous factor-driven standards to determine whether an employer improperly disciplined a union employee. For example, previous standards considered whether the offensive conduct was a result of an employer’s unfair labor practice or whether the use of profanity was reasonable in light of the context—e.g., during demonstrations in picket lines. These murky standards made it difficult for employers to properly discipline unruly employees who were participating in union-related activity. Moreover, the NLRB noted the tension between the labor and employment laws. Specifically, employers have an obligation under employment laws to ensure that the workplace is not a hostile work environment, but the prior standards under labor law allowed employees to engage in profane and offensive behavior at the workplace, so long as it was during protected union-related activity. Accordingly, the NLRB decided to re-adopt the Wright Line standard, which requires proof that a motivating factor in the employer’s decision to discipline an employee was that the employee was engaging in protected activity. If the employee meets that burden, then the employer must show that it would have taken the same action in the absence of the protected activity.
Key Takeaway
Employers will have an easier (and less confusing) time of ensuring a safe and respectful workplace. Employers should proactively define what constitutes offensive and abusive behavior. Additionally, employers should ensure disciplinary actions are consistent and properly documented.
This document is intended to provide you with general information regarding an NLRB decision concerning employee discipline. The contents of this document are not intended to provide specific legal advice. If you have any questions about the contents of this document or if you need legal advice as to an issue, please contact the attorneys listed or your regular Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP attorney. This communication may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions.
Recent Insights
Read MorePresident Trump Sends Letters Updating Tariffs; Extends “Reciprocal” Tariff Pause to Aug. 1
Client Alert | July 07, 2025The First Amendment and Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) Prescription Drug Ads
Client Alert | July 03, 2025White House Seeks To Streamline Funding For Domestic Energy, Critical Mineral Projects
Client Alert | July 02, 2025Senate Finance Committee Tax Title – Summary and Analysis
Client Alert | July 01, 2025Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Reconciliation Bill Summary
Client Alert | July 01, 2025Senate Concludes OBBBA Vote-a-Rama
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.