Loveland, Bryce C.

Bryce Loveland represents numerous pension, health and welfare, training and vacation savings plans and trusts in litigation, and in ERISA, HIPAA and Affordable Care Act compliance. He is experienced in collecting unpaid employee benefit contributions, withdrawal liability and third party reimbursement for his clients. He also assists his clients with Department of Labor and IRS audit defense.

Dedicated to giving back to his community, Bryce serves as the Las Vegas office coordinator on the firm’s Pro Bono Committee and also serves as the chair of the Board of Nevada P.E.P., a statewide nonprofit that provides education and encouragement to families with children with disabilities. 

Representative Matters
  • Obtained summary judgment against Nevada Labor Commissioner that state statute purporting to regulate trusts was preempted by ERISA. Board of Trustees of the Glazing Health and Welfare Trust v. Chambers, 168 F. Supp.3d 1320 (D. Nev. March 10, 2016). After the Nevada legislature modified the statute and a 2-1 Ninth Circuit decision reversing the district court, obtained unanimous en banc opinion from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that the issue was moot.

  • Obtained summary judgment against Nevada Labor Commissioner that state statute purporting to regulate trusts was preempted by ERISA. Board of Trustees of the Glazing Health and Welfare Trust v. Chambers, 168 F. Supp.3d 1320 (D. Nev. March 10, 2016). After the Nevada legislature modified the statute and a 2-1 Ninth Circuit decision reversing the district court, obtained judgment from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that the issue was moot. 941 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 2019) (en banc).

  • Obtained judgment after trial for full amounts owed including delinquent contributions, liquidated damages, interest, attorney’s fees and audit fees. Trustees of Plumbers and Pipefitters Union Local 525 Health and Welfare Trust and Plan v. Sotelo, 2018 WL 3240959 (D. Nev. July 3, 2018).

  • Obtained over $1 million judgment against alter ego entity of employer who failed to pay required employee benefit contributions. Board of Trustees of Teamsters Local 631 Security Fund for Southern Nevada v. Lightning Exhibits, LLC, No. 2:16-cv-03032, 2018 WL 4566668 (D. Nev. September 24, 2018).

  • Obtained a $1.9M judgment against employer, alter ego company and owner/fiduciaries who failed to pay their employees’ fringe benefits. Board of Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters Union Local 525 Health and Welfare Trust and Plan v. Security Plumbing & Air Conditioning, 2017 WL 923913 (D. Nev. March 8, 2017).

  • Successful defense of health plan from participant claim for benefits. Glasco v. Employee Benefit Management Services, No. A15-719199-C (Nev.Dist.Ct. Aug. 31, 2016).

  • Obtained judgment for delinquencies, interest, liquidated damages and attorney’s fees against delinquent employer and its owner, individually, for failing to pay employee benefits on behalf of employer’s own employees. Board of Trustees of Const. Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust v. Collins, 2014 WL 4581279, (D. Nev. September 29, 2014).

  • Obtained judgment that included punitive damages against dental office for fraudulent billing to health plan. Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust v. Vargas, No. 12A673576 (Nev.Dist.Ct. June 12, 2014).

  • Counsel in recovering third party reimbursement owed to single and multiemployer health plans in hundreds of separate matters, including a case recovering 100% of health plan’s lien against third party reimbursement settlement fund plus 100% of attorney’s fees incurred in prosecuting the lien. The Powell Litigation Group v. Peltier, 2013 WL 6978781 (Nev.Dist.Ct.)

  • Obtained judgments against participants who were ineligible for health plan benefits but erroneously received them. Trustees of the Teamsters Local 631 Security Fund for Southern Nevada v. Beavers, No. 2:13-cv-00824, 2014 WL 1302035 (D. Nev. March 28, 2014)

  • Assisted in obtaining judgment against pension plan’s investment manager and investment consultant for overcharging commissions and engaging in prohibited transactions. Trustees of Nevada Resort Ass’n – Int’l Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees & Moving Picture Mach. Operators of U.S. & Canada Local 720 Pension Trust v. Grasswood Partners, Inc., No. 2:11-CV-00044-MMD, 2013 WL 1249617 (D. Nev. Mar. 27, 2013).

  • Obtained judgment against a bond company for ERISA employer’s debt to multiemployer benefit trust funds and for attorneys’ fees in excess of bond limit. Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters v Pyles, No. 12A663410, 2013 WL 6222083 (Nev.Dist.Ct. Oct. 18, 2013)

  • Obtained judgment against a company created to avoid multiemployer benefit trust fund obligations owed by a prior alter ego company. Trustees of Const. Indus. & Laborers Health & Welfare Trust v. Pro-Cut LLC, No. 2:12-CV-00205-APG, 2013 WL 4049662 (D. Nev. Aug. 9, 2013).

  • Obtained defense judgment on behalf of national health insurer against bad faith claim for rescission of policy at the trial court level and on appeal. Siefers v. PacifiCare Life Assur. Co., 461 F. App’x 652, 653 (9th Cir. 2011).

  • Represented health insurers and Medicare Advantage organizations in emergency TRO and preliminary injunction motions involving contract disputes and noncompetition issues with providers.

  • Obtained judgment against employer for withdrawal liability on behalf of pension plan. Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters Union Local 525 Health and Welfare Trust and Plan v. Southwest Air Conditioning, Inc., 2012 WL 6096672 (D. Nev. December 4, 2012).

  • Successful defense of health insurer in an action brought for benefits where member failed to obtain preauthorization for experimental surgery not covered under the terms of the member’s health plan. Anderson v. PacifiCare of Nevada, Inc., No. 2:10-CV-1279-GMN-PAL, 2012 WL 1155448 (D. Nev. Apr. 5, 2012).

News & Events
Community

Nevada, P.E.P., a statewide nonprofit that provides education and encouragement to families with children with disabilities

  • Chairperson (2014-present)
  • Volunteer, Governing Board member and Treasurer (2008-2014)

Charles England Local 525 Education Scholarship Trust, Board Member (2017-present)

Publications & Presentations
  • How Employers Can Assist Employees (Current and Former) Right Now

    Countless employers have been forced to reduce employees’ hours or terminate employees due to the 2019 novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”). Federal and state governments are working to pass stimulus legislation to assist the people and businesses most affected by the economic fallout created by this national emergency. In the meantime, beyond offering paid sick leave or implementing severance pay programs, employers can take other actions under existing employee benefit programs to cushion the fall for their current and former employees. Below is a summary of some of these actions:

    Amend Group Health Plans
    • Subsidize COBRA. An employer must offer COBRA (or the state law equivalent if a small employer) to an employee who loses group health plan coverage due to a reduction in hours or a termination of employment. Qualified beneficiaries typically are required to pay the full COBRA premium of up to 102% of the cost.1 However, an employer could subsidize the cost of the COBRA premium for its former employee in order to ensure the continued coverage is affordable. When offering subsidized COBRA coverage, be certain to state in the notice that the subsidy period runs concurrently with and does not lengthen the regularly applicable COBRA coverage period. Brownstein Comment: We’d be happy to talk with you about how to structure any COBRA subsidies since they could be provided in different ways (reimbursement, employer-direct pay, or direct payment to the qualified beneficiary) with varying advantages, disadvantages and employer risk.
    • Allow Coverage for Part-Time Employees. Many group health plans impose a “full-time” employment requirement in order for an employee to be eligible for coverage. “Full-time” is typically defined as working 30 hours or more per week consistent with the Affordable Care Act’s definition of a full-time employee. An employer could amend its group health plan to provide coverage to employees who are scheduled to work less than the full-time threshold. Doing so would negate the need to offer COBRA and could be limited to a set period of time. In addition, to protect variable-hour employees’ coverage, applicable large employers should consider revising applicable lookback measurement periods during the COVID-19 crisis. Brownstein Comment: While we are aware that some insurers are issuing FAQs indicating that coverage of employees not meeting the agreed-upon eligibility requirements will be permitted for a specified, limited period of time, we recommend that, if you have a fully insured plan, you review your policy requirements and confirm coverage of part-timers with the insurer so as to avoid creating any situation where health services would be denied by the insurer.
    Amend Dependent Care Spending Accounts (“DCAP”)
    • Add a Spend-down Provision. A spend-down provision allows terminated employees to use the money remaining in the employee’s DCAP for qualified benefits incurred through the end of the plan year in which the employee is terminated.2 Expenses incurred after a termination of employment are only eligible for DCAP reimbursement if they enable the employee or spouse to be employed (by a new employer), looking for work, or attending school full-time.3 While there will be practical limitations to incurring eligible expenses during the COVID-19 crisis, a spend-down provision removes one roadblock to the use of DCAP funds.
    • Add a Grace Period. If not already in the plan, add a provision that permits employees to carry over unused DCAP contributions from one year to the next so they don’t lose amounts already saved to the DCAP in 2020 that they may be unable to use in 2020 for reasons like being required to work from home and/or the shutdown of day care facilities. The plan may allow participants to access unused amounts remaining in their accounts at the end of a plan year to pay or reimburse expenses for qualified benefits (such as DCAP expenses) incurred during a grace period of up to two months and 15 days following the close of the plan year.4
    • Allow Mid-Year Changes. Ensure that the plan contains provisions and has administrative practice that allows an employee to elect to cease salary deferrals into the DCAP if they take FMLA due to their own or a family member becomes ill with COVID-19.5 Brownstein Comment: Given the national emergency in which we find ourselves, the IRS would not likely object to liberal interpretations of mid-year election change provisions in order to allow employees to cease their salary deferrals to DCAPs to avoid negative financial consequences if such deferrals were not otherwise allowed.6
    Amend Retirement Plans
    • Allow Multiple Loans and/or Suspend Repayments. An employer that sponsors a profit-sharing plan (“PSP”), 401(k) plan or 403(b) plan could amend the plan to permit plan loans to participants. If a plan already allows loans but limits each participant to only one loan at a time, the plan could be amended to allow more than one plan loan outstanding at a time. In addition, the plan could be amended to provide for suspension of the loan repayment requirements during (i) an unpaid bona fide leave of absence for up to one year or (ii) a paid leave of absence when the participant’s rate of pay (after income and employment tax withholding) is less than the installment payment required under the terms of the loan.7 Brownstein Comment: Current law and regulations limit plan loans to a participant to the lesser of (i) 50% of the participant’s vested account balance and (ii) $50,000.8 We are aware that some legislation being presented to Congress includes changes to those limitations, so future access to more funds through plan loans may be possible.
    • Fully Vest Participants. An employer could amend its qualified retirement plan to fully vest participants’ accounts to the extent funded and not already fully vested. By doing so, the employer would make more money available to participants terminated as a result of COVID-19’s impact on the employer. If this measure is combined with a hardship distribution (see below), the participants would be able to access more money without a penalty.
    • Add or Expand In-Service Distribution Provisions.
      • In-Service Distributions. Employers that sponsor a PSP or 401(k) may amend the plan to allow for in-service distribution of amounts that have been held in the plan for at least 24 months. A PSP also could provide for distributions after stated events, such as a furlough, layoff or hardship. A distribution of profit-sharing contributions is also permitted after a fixed number of years to a participant who has participated in the plan for at least five years.9 Brownstein Comment: Ordinarily such a distribution before age 59½ would be subject to the 10% early distribution excise tax. However, both proposed Senate and House bills contain a waiver of this excise tax on “coronavirus related distributions” taken in 2020.
      • Hardship Distributions. Safe harbor hardship events that permit distributions under a 401(k) plan or 403(b) plan include, among others, (i) expenses for medical care previously incurred by the participant, the participant’s spouse, any of the participant’s dependents, or the participant’s primary beneficiary under the plan; or expenses necessary for those persons to obtain medical care deductible under Code §213; (ii) payments necessary to prevent the eviction of the participant from the participant’s principal residence or foreclosure on the mortgage on that residence; and (iii) expenses and losses (including loss of income) incurred by the employee on account of a disaster declared by FEMA, provided the employee’s principal residence or place of employment at the time of the disaster was located in an area designated by FEMA for individual assistance.10 An employer could amend its plan to make hardship distributions during the COVID-19 crisis that meet one or more these safe harbor events.
    • Revise Method for Counting Hours of Service. If a qualified retirement plan normally credits hours using the counting hours method, an employer could amend the plan to credit hours on an elapsed time basis during the COVID-19 crisis. Under the elapsed time method, service time is credited generally based on date of hire to date of termination, without regard to the actual numbers of hours worked during that period. This may prevent employees with reduced hours from losing accruals and vesting under the plan.11
    Establish a Qualified Disaster Relief Payment Program

    An employer may set up a “qualified disaster relief program” under Code §139. Any amount paid to reimburse or pay reasonable and necessary personal, family, living or funeral expenses incurred as a result of a qualified disaster would fall within the definition of a qualified disaster relief payment to the extent any expense compensated by the payment is not otherwise compensated for by insurance or some other reimbursement.

    Qualified disaster relief payments are excluded from an employee’s gross income and from the employee’s wages and compensation for purposes of employment taxes. As a result, these payments are not subject to federal income tax withholding, FICA or FUTA. The payments do not have to be reported by an employer making the payment on the receiving employee’s Form W-2, and do not have to be reported as income by the affected employee.12 Brownstein Comment: While current guidance does not require much, if any, recordkeeping, an employer should keep appropriate records in order to document its corporate tax deduction.

    How We Can Help

    Please contact one of us or your regular Brownstein attorney for answers to your questions and help with addressing your concerns about how to assist employees in the midst of the economic fallout from the spread of the coronavirus. Among other things, we can help you determine if (and how) your plan needs to be amended and help you craft appropriate communications to your employees. We also have employment law experts who can help you address related employment law issues, including applicable state wage and leave laws.

    Click here to read more Brownstein alerts on the legal issues the coronavirus pandemic raises for businesses.

     

    1 Code § 4980B(f)(2)(C). The COBRA premium can be up to 115% for disabled individual coverage.

    2 Prop. Treas. Reg. § 1.125-6(a)(4)(v).

    3 Code § 129(e).

    4 Prop. Treas. Reg. §§ 1.125-1(e) and 1.125-5(c)(1).

    5 Treas. Reg. § 1.125-3, Q&A-7.

    6 We are aware of prior informal non-binding remarks from officials in the IRS Office of Chief Counsel indicating that the DCAP election rules should be liberally interpreted.

    7 Treas. Reg. § 1.72(p)-1, Q/A-9.

    8 See Code § 72(p)(2).

    9 Treas. Reg. § 1.401-1(b)(1)(ii); see also Rev. Rul. 68-24, 1968-1 C.B. 150. See also Rev. Rul. 54-231, 1954-1 C.B. 150.

    10 Treas. Reg. § 1.401(k)-1(d)(3), as amended to reflect the SECURE Act.

    11 See Treas. Reg. § 1.410(a)-7(g).

    12 Note that applicable state and local laws need to be consulted to determine whether these amounts are subject to any state and local taxes (and related tax  Qualified Disaster Relief Payments withholding).

     

    This document is intended to provide you with general information regarding about employee benefits issues. The contents of this document are not intended to provide specific legal advice. If you have any questions about the contents of this document or if you need legal advice as to an issue, please contact the attorneys listed or your regular Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP attorney. This communication may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions.

  • Health Plan Coverage of Coronavirus Testing and Treatment

    Brownstein Client Alert, March 12, 2020

  • “Actual Knowledge” Required to Apply ERISA’S Three-Year Statute of Limitations to Fiduciary Breach Claims

    Brownstein Client Alert, February 27, 2020

  • Employee Benefits-Related Limits For 2020
    Brownstein Client Alert, November 7, 2019

  • IRS Implements Prospective Expansion of Determination Letter Program to Merged Plans
    Brownstein Client Alert, May 7, 2019

  • IRS Expands Self-Correction of Retirement Plan Errors

    Brownstein Client Alert, April 25, 2019

  • Don't Ignore Successor Liability For Pension Plan Withdrawal
    Co-author, Law360, April 4, 2019

  • 2019 Increases for Employee Benefits-Related Limits
    Brownstein Client Alert, November 16, 2018

  • Revised Employee Benefits-Related Limits for 2018; Decreases in Family HSA Contributions and Adoption Assistance Require Action
    Brownstein Client Alert, March 6, 2018

  • Updated Employee Benefits-Related Limits for 2018

    Brownstein Client Alert, November 30, 2017

  • Employee Benefits-Related Limits for 2018
    Brownstein Client Alert, November 7, 2017

  • Approaches to Effective Collection Practices
    International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans (IFEBP) Annual Employee Benefits Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, 2017

  • Employee Benefits-Related Limits For 2016
    Brownstein Client Alert, November 2, 2015

  • The Affordable Care Act & Pension Reform: Meeting the Challenges of Transition and Change
    Inter-Union Gas Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, 2015

  • Health Flexible Spending Account Annual Contribution Limit Decreases to $2,500
    Brownstein Benefits Client Update, May 31, 2012

Education
  • J.D., 2006, cum laude, UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law
  • B.A., 2003, Brigham Young University
Admissions
  • Nevada
  • U.S. District Court, District of Nevada
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Recognition

Vegas Inc, 40 Under 40, 2020

Super Lawyers, Mountain States, Rising Star, 2014-2016

Symposium Editor, Nevada Law Journal, UNLV, William S. Boyd School of Law
Membership

State Bar of Nevada

Clark County Bar Association

American Bar Association

 

attorney-19402