2024 California March Primary Preview: Update on Open-Seat Elections
Co-authors, Brownstein Client Alert, Feb. 22, 2024
With ballots arriving California voters’ mailboxes, this alert provides a snapshot analysis of the open seats in the California Legislature for the 2024 primary. It’s worth noting that in the secretary of state’s pre-primary voter registration report, there was an uptick in Republican registration with the GOP gaining 46,000 registered voters statewide between October 2023 and January 2024. Democrats lost 30,000 voters statewide in the same timeframe and saw decreased registration advantage in just about every Assembly district in the state. “No Party Preference” voters saw a drop of about 70,000 voters. However, Democratic voters still outnumber Republican voters by over 22% statewide (approximately 9.1 million registered voters to 4.8 million).
Below is a list of open seats in each chamber in the upcoming election with the current incumbents’ and their party affiliation noted in red for Republicans and blue for Democrats, followed by a snapshot of each race. This list reflects district maps updated after the 2020 redistricting cycle.
Click here for a snapshot analysis of each race.
OPEN ASSEMBLY SEATS
AD 1: Megan Dahle (Bieber/Rural Northern CA)
AD 2: Jim Wood (Healdsburg)
AD 6: Kevin McCarty (Sacramento)
AD 8: Jim Patterson (Mariposa)
AD 13: Carlos Villapudua (Stockton)
AD 15: Timothy Grayson (Concord)
AD 19: Philip Ting (San Francisco)
AD 26: Evan Low (Silicon Valley)
AD 32: Vince Fong (Bakersfield)
AD 33: Devon Mathis (Tulare)
AD 36: Eduardo Garcia (Imperial/Riverside/San Bernadino)
AD 41: Chris Holden (Los Angeles/Pasadena)
AD 44: Laura Friedman (Los Angeles/Glendale)
AD 50: Eloise Gómez Reyes (San Bernardino)
AD 52: Wendy Carrillo (Los Angeles/East LA)
AD 53: Freddie Rodriguez (Chino Hills/Pomona)
AD 54: Miguel Santiago (Downtown Los Angeles)
AD 57: Reggie Jones-Sawyer (South Los Angeles)
AD 58: Sabrina Cervantes (Riverside)
AD 62: Anthony Rendon (Southgate/Paramount/Unincorporated LA County)
AD 75: Marie Waldron (Santee/Poway)
AD 76: Brian Maienschein (Rancho Santa Fe)
AD 79: Akilah Weber (San Diego/La Mesa)
OPEN SENATE SEATS
SD 1: Brian Dahle (Bieber/Rural Northern CA)
SD 3: Bill Dodd (Napa)
SD 5: Susan Talmantes Eggman (Stockton/San Joaquin County)
SD 7: Nancy Skinner (Berkeley/Alameda County)
SD 9: Steve Glazer (Orinda/Lafayette)
SD 23: Scott Wilk (Santa Clarita)
SD 25: Anthony Portantino (La Canada Flintridge)
SD 29: New Seat (San Bernardino)
SD 31: Richard Roth (Riverside)
SD 35: Steven Bradford (Gardena/Carson)
SD 37: Dave Min (Irvine/Costa Mesa)
SD 39: Toni Atkins (San Diego)
THIS DOCUMENT IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE YOU WITH GENERAL INFORMATION REGARDING CALIFORNIA'S 2024 PRIMARIES. THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC LEGAL ADVICE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT OR IF YOU NEED LEGAL ADVICE AS TO AN ISSUE, PLEASE CONTACT THE ATTORNEYS LISTED OR YOUR REGULAR BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP ATTORNEY. THIS COMMUNICATION MAY BE CONSIDERED ADVERTISING IN SOME JURISDICTIONS. THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS ACCURATE AS OF THE PUBLICATION DATE. BECAUSE THE LAW IN THIS AREA IS CHANGING RAPIDLY, AND INSIGHTS ARE NOT AUTOMATICALLY UPDATED, CONTINUED ACCURACY CANNOT BE GUARANTEED.
Recent Insights
Read MoreColorado Redevelopment Projects Face Impact Fee Exposure: Lessons from Carroll Partners
Podcast | May 11, 2026Section by Section the Trump Administration Rebuilds its Tariff Regime
Client Alert | May 11, 2026Section 122 Case Raises Prospect of Additional Tariff Refund
Client Alert | May 08, 2026China Invokes “Blocking Statute” Framework Ahead of Trump–Xi Summit
Client Alert | May 07, 2026Denver Amends Zoning Code to Possibly Save Thousands of Housing Units with SDP Extension
Client Alert | May 05, 2026FinCEN Proposes Sweeping AML/CFT Reforms: What Casinos Need to Know
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.