Capital Framework Changes Will Strike Better Balance
Co-Author, Mortgage Banker Magazine, May 1, 2023
At the end of February, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced a proposed rule to amend the Enterprise Regulatory Capital Framework (ERCF) for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Enterprises). FHFA indicated that the proposed rule would clarify the ERCF and further align it with risks faced by the Enterprises.
Under the new proposed rule, commingled Uniform Mortgage-Backed Security’s (UMBS) capital requirements would reduce from 20% to 5%, while credit conversion factors would reduce 100% to 50%. Additionally, the rule proposes a risk multiplier of 0.6 for certain subsidy-associated multifamily mortgage exposures, offers a standardized approach for counterparty credit risk (SA-CCR), and modifies procedures for determining a representative credit score for single-family mortgage exposure. Overall, these changes are estimated to lower the common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital needed to meet the Enterprises’ risk-based capital requirements and buffers from $226.4 billion annually to $220.8 billion.
Now, FHFA is seeking comment on this rule and interested stakeholders should review the proposal for any impact.
For read the rest of this article, click here.
Recent Insights
Read More2026: New Year, New Laws for California Employers
Client Alert | December 12, 2025Trump Administration Issues EO Advancing Federal Preemption of AI Laws
Client Alert | December 10, 2025What to Watch During the Florida 2026 Legislative Session
Client Alert | December 10, 2025What Out-of-State Developers Need to Know Before Building in Southern Nevada
Client Alert | December 09, 2025November 2025 Tax Regulatory Update
Client Alert | December 09, 2025Administrative Adjudication Appeal May Waive Seventh Amendment Right to Jury Trial
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.