Colorado Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Case That Could Pose Threat to Metropolitan Districts
On September 20, 2017, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral arguments in UMB Bank v. Landmark Towers Association, 2016SC455. The case was brought by the homeowner’s association of a condominium development regarding a TABOR election that took place several years ago. The purpose of the election was to form a metropolitan district that could issue bonds to finance new development and infrastructure in the area. The legal questions before the court concern when the results of a TABOR election are considered final and therefore immune from challenge, as well as the validity of using option contracts as a legal method of qualifying electors for an election to establish a metropolitan district.
To read the full alert, please click the PDF above.
Recent Insights
Read MoreThe Coming Wave of U.S.-China AI Trade Secret Litigation—What Companies Should Be Doing Now
Client Alert | May 11, 2026Colorado Redevelopment Projects Face Impact Fee Exposure: Lessons from Carroll Partners
Podcast | May 11, 2026Section by Section the Trump Administration Rebuilds its Tariff Regime
Client Alert | May 11, 2026Section 122 Case Raises Prospect of Additional Tariff Refund
Client Alert | May 08, 2026China Invokes “Blocking Statute” Framework Ahead of Trump–Xi Summit
Client Alert | May 07, 2026Denver Amends Zoning Code to Possibly Save Thousands of Housing Units with SDP Extension
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.