Colorado Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Case That Could Pose Threat to Metropolitan Districts
On September 20, 2017, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral arguments in UMB Bank v. Landmark Towers Association, 2016SC455. The case was brought by the homeowner’s association of a condominium development regarding a TABOR election that took place several years ago. The purpose of the election was to form a metropolitan district that could issue bonds to finance new development and infrastructure in the area. The legal questions before the court concern when the results of a TABOR election are considered final and therefore immune from challenge, as well as the validity of using option contracts as a legal method of qualifying electors for an election to establish a metropolitan district.
To read the full alert, please click the PDF above.
Recent Insights
Read MoreShape the Future of Geothermal in 2026—Policy, Trends and Opportunities
Client Alert | January 15, 2026The FTC Announces Increased HSR Thresholds for 2026
Client Alert | January 14, 2026New Year’s Resolution: Get a Handle on Intellectual Property
Presentation | January 14, 2026Safe Yield and Sustainable Yield: Comparable Terms or Distinctly Different?
Podcast | January 13, 2026The Legal Implications of President Trump’s Tariff Policy
Client Alert | January 12, 2026California’s New “Workplace Know Your Rights” Act: What Employers Need to Know
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.