Compliance Lessons From DOJ’s First Terrorism-support Prosecution of Foreign Corporations
Author, Washington Legal Foundation, Oct. 17, 2022
A French building materials manufacturer and its Syrian subsidiary made history last week week by pleading guilty to federal terrorism charges after a long-running investigation led by DOJ’s National Security Division. This is the first ever criminal prosecution of a company for conspiring to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization (“FTO”) in violation of U.S. law. The companies were immediately sentenced to terms of probation and penalties totaling nearly $800 million. The details reveal significant potential lessons for companies doing business is certain regions of the world.
According to the plea documents, the two defendants, Lafarge, and Lafarge Cement Syria (“LCS”) conspired to pay two FTO’s, the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (“ISIS”) and the al-Nusrah Front (“ANF”), for permission to operate a cement plant in Syria during 2013 and 2014. The defendants opened the plant in May of 2010 at a cost of approximately $680 million and operated it until September of 2014. After the start of the Syrian Civil War in 2011, the companies paid armed factions in the war, including ISIS and ANF, a total of nearly $6 million to ensure continued operation of the plant, protect plant employees, and obtain economic advantage over their competitors in the region. These payments violated 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(a)(1). By late 2014, the situation in Syria became increasingly dangerous and LCS evacuated its plant there.
Click here to read the full article.
TAGS:
Contributors:
Recent Insights
Read MoreUPDATED: President Trump Sends Letters Updating Tariffs; Extends Tariff Pause to Aug. 1
Article | July 11, 2025Has Antitrust Returned to the “Domain of Law”?
Client Alert | July 09, 2025Colorado Makes Consequential Changes to the Ballot Measure Process
Client Alert | July 08, 2025Final Health Care Provisions in the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act”
Client Alert | July 08, 2025The One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act – Summary and Analysis of the Tax Title
Podcast | July 08, 2025The One Trillion Dollar Question: Defense Spending in 2025
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.