Developing International Perspectives on Market Definition in Digital Markets
How should we think about market definition in digital markets? This is a practical question, as antitrust cases are often won or lost on market definition. As one of many examples, Judge Mehta remarked in FTC v. Sysco that market definition “has been the parties’ primary battlefield in this case.” Will market definition be the battlefield in cases involving digital markets? And should it be?
The year 2019 saw three major policy reports on digital markets by experts in the United Kingdom, Europe, and the United States. These reports consisted of a review by an expert panel in the United Kingdom entitled “Unlocking Digital Competition”; a report commissioned by the European Commission entitled “Competition policy for the digital era, Report to the European Commission”; and, in the United States, a non-governmental report prepared under the auspices of the Stigler Center at the University of Chicago entitled “Committee on Digital Platforms, Market Structure and Antitrust Subcommittee Report.”
Click here to read the entire article.
TAGS:
Contributors:
Recent Insights
Read MoreWhat to Expect From the 2026 Wyoming Legislative Session
Client Alert | January 23, 2026Workplace Safety Obligations at the Edge of the First Amendment
Client Alert | January 23, 2026Diverging Paths on Health Care Affordability: Inside the White House and Congressional GOP Plans
Client Alert | January 23, 2026Appropriate Timing: Appropriations Legislation Enters the Home Stretch
Client Alert | January 23, 2026Trump Issues Executive Order on Institutional Investor Purchases of Single-Family Homes
Client Alert | January 22, 2026What to Know about Maryland’s 2026 Legislative Session
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.