Developing International Perspectives on Market Definition in Digital Markets
How should we think about market definition in digital markets? This is a practical question, as antitrust cases are often won or lost on market definition. As one of many examples, Judge Mehta remarked in FTC v. Sysco that market definition “has been the parties’ primary battlefield in this case.” Will market definition be the battlefield in cases involving digital markets? And should it be?
The year 2019 saw three major policy reports on digital markets by experts in the United Kingdom, Europe, and the United States. These reports consisted of a review by an expert panel in the United Kingdom entitled “Unlocking Digital Competition”; a report commissioned by the European Commission entitled “Competition policy for the digital era, Report to the European Commission”; and, in the United States, a non-governmental report prepared under the auspices of the Stigler Center at the University of Chicago entitled “Committee on Digital Platforms, Market Structure and Antitrust Subcommittee Report.”
Click here to read the entire article.
TAGS:
Contributors:
Recent Insights
Read MoreChina Tightens Export Declaration Criteria for Machine Tools and Drone‑Related Products
Client Alert | June 11, 2026FCC Enforcement Process Survives Seventh Amendment Challenge
Presentation | June 10, 2026AI-Assisted Innovations: An International Perspective on Patent Eligibility, Inventorship, Prosecution and Enforcement
Presentation | June 10, 2026Trade Secrets, AI and the Hidden Risks of Collaboration in the V2G Ecosystem
Client Alert | June 09, 2026Executive Order Tightens CBP Requirements for U.S. Importers of Record
Client Alert | June 08, 2026Can You Enforce Trade Secrets in “Vibe-Coded” Systems?
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.