Ever Played Ping Pong on a Roller Coaster?
In October, Judge Scott W. Skavdahl writing for the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming overturned and vacated the Bureau of Land Management’s (“BLM’s”) Obama-era waste prevention rule, better known as the “Venting and Flaring Rule” (the “2016 rule”).
As a starting point, the case involved a challenge to BLM’s efforts to update the way in which the waste of oil and gas resources on federal and Indian lands is managed under the Mineral Leasing Act (“MLA”). From 1980 to 2016, BLM accomplished this through Notice to Lessees 4A (“NTL 4A”) which, at a high level, assessed royalties on “avoidably lost” gas while allowing venting or flaring on “unavoidably lost” gas. The 2016 rule maintained this general framework but added substantial detail to the avoidably lost/unavoidably lost determination and imposed new requirements on operators.
Click here to read the entire article.
Recent Insights
Read MoreCEQA Reform: AB 130 and SB 131 Create Series of Exemptions for Wide Range of Projects
Client Alert | July 16, 2025Senate Prepares for Rescissions Vote-a-Rama
Client Alert | July 16, 2025CEQA Infill Exemptions and “Near Miss” Streamlining—A Concrete Fix for California’s Housing Crisis?
Podcast | July 15, 2025How to Overcome Entitlement Obstacles in Colorado
Client Alert | July 15, 2025Made in California: Proposals to Accelerate Manufacturing in the State Move Forward
Client Alert | July 15, 2025State AGs Arm Up for Privacy Enforcement with Technical Hiring Surge—Is AI Next?
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.