The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is seeking comment on ways to improve the dialogue between tribes and carriers that provide subsidized telephone and broadband services to tribal areas using federal universal service funds. Current FCC rules require these carriers to engage in annual discussions with tribes to develop a common understanding of communications deployment. However, the process has not been fully effective.
The FCC states that it has received reports of problems “with providers’ efforts to initiate engagement with Tribal leaders,” including difficulty in keeping current with tribal leaders and “varying levels of responsive from Tribes.” Some tribes have expressed concern that carriers were unwilling to travel to tribal lands for the discussions. In light of such concerns, the FCC seeks comment on the following:
- Specific steps the FCC can take or recommend to assist parties in their engagement efforts.
- Whether parties should meet more than once a year.
- The cause of the reported difficulties in the engagement process.
- The benefit of in-person meetings as compared to phone or video-conference discussions.
- Best practices that have fostered meaningful engagements.
Finally, the FCC also seeks to refresh the record on previously filed petitions asking the agency to reconsider the engagement obligation, and the requirement to submit reports on the discussions to the FCC, on the grounds that it is overly burdensome.
The FCC’s proceeding offers an opportunity for tribes and carriers to inform the agency on how to improve the engagement process and, as a result, improve the provision of broadband services in tribal areas. Comments to the FCC are due on Dec. 5, 2019, and reply comments are due on Jan. 6, 2020.
This document is intended to provide you with general information regardingthe FCC ‘s efforts to engage Native American tribes. The contents of this document are not intended to provide specific legal advice. If you have any questions about the contents of this document or if you need legal advice as to an issue, please contact the attorneys listed or your regular Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP attorney. This communication may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions.
Recent Insights
Read MoreCalifornia’s AB 1050: Removing Barriers to Housing Redevelopment on Commercial Properties
Presentation | December 05, 2025International Considerations in Your Life Sciences IP Due Diligence Review
Presentation | December 05, 2025Vested Rights and Development Agreements
Client Alert | December 04, 2025Risk Assessments Under the New CCPA Regulations Commence Jan. 1, 2026
Article | December 04, 2025Legislative Updates for Planning and Zoning
Client Alert | December 04, 2025Amazon v. Malloy: A Shakeup in NV Wage and Hour Law Results in New Legislation
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.