Federal District Court Rejects OLC Opinion Reinterpreting The Wire Act
On February 20, we posted about a November 2018 U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) opinion that reversed a 2011 OLC opinion on the scope of the Wire Act, a law that prohibits certain gaming activities across state lines. The 2011 opinion had clarified that the statute applied to sports betting only. The new opinion reinterpreted the Wire Act to prohibit all forms of wagering activity that crosses state lines, not just sports betting. We also reported back in February that two lawsuits had been filed challenging the new opinion. Last week, that litigation was decided in favor of the plaintiffs, with a federal court effectively setting aside the new opinion with a declaration that the Wire Act applies to sports betting only.
Click here to read the entire article.
TAGS:
Contributors:
Recent Insights
Read MoreChina Invokes “Blocking Statute” Framework Ahead of Trump–Xi Summit
Client Alert | May 07, 2026Denver Amends Zoning Code to Possibly Save Thousands of Housing Units with SDP Extension
Client Alert | May 05, 2026FinCEN Proposes Sweeping AML/CFT Reforms: What Casinos Need to Know
Article | May 05, 2026Beyond Billables: How Pro Bono Elevates Big Law
Article | May 05, 2026Nevada’s Middle Path on Non Competes: Revise, Don’t Rewrite
Client Alert | May 04, 2026Expanding Pathways for Thermal Energy and Geothermal Development
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.