In the current legislative/regulatory environment, junk fees are a popular talking point, especially in light of an imminent and disruptive presidential election. But such fees originated generally to protect both consumers AND lenders. In a time of a polarized, often inactive Congress, regulators have begun painting everything with the junk-fees brush, and that sets a dangerous precedent. Join ACUMA President Peter Benjamin in this next Policy Podcast as he and Leah Dempsey, Shareholder, and Annmarie Conboy-DePasquale, Policy Advisor with Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, unwind those and other concerns facing credit unions lost in the currently regulatory haze.
Click here to listen to the full podcast.
Recent Insights
Read MoreNational Employment Law Update
Client Alert | July 01, 2026Trump Administration Decides Against Renewing USMCA, Opts for Annual Review Process
Client Alert | July 01, 2026Colorado 2026 Primary Election Results
Article | July 01, 2026Md. Ruling Reflects Classic Administrative Law Principle
Presentation | June 30, 2026Who’s Liable When AI Agents Misbehave?
Client Alert | June 29, 2026State Department Expands Pax Silica Initiative at 2026 Summit
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.