Four Key Takeaways From DOJ Advisory Opinion Clarifying Extortion Exception to FCPA
Co-Author, Washington Legal Foundation, March 15, 2022
In a rare Foreign Corruption Practices Act advisory opinion, the Department of Justice recently clarified that a payment made by a U.S. company to a foreign country through a third-party intermediary in response to an extortionary demand does not necessarily violate the statute. While the specifics of this situation are unique, both the details of DOJ’s opinion and the way in which DOJ handled the request may be instructive for compliance officers, in-house counsel, and the FCPA bar.
The facts according to DOJ are as follows. In October 2021, a maritime vessel owned by a U.S. company inadvertently sailed into the territorial waters of Country A while in the process of anchoring outside a port in Country B. Apparently, the vessel’s captain had received incorrect anchoring coordinates which led to the error. Upon the vessel’s entry in Country A’s waters, it was intercepted by a Country A naval vessel and was directed to a port in Country A where the captain was taken ashore and jailed. Compounding the situation was the fact that the captain was, at the time, suffering from serious medical conditions that were exacerbated by the circumstances and created a significant risk to his well-being.
Click here to read the full article.
Contributors:
Recent Insights
Read MoreTax Regulatory Update
Client Alert | January 08, 2026FCC Extends Compliance Deadline for “Revoke All” Rule
Client Alert | January 07, 2026China Strengthens Export Controls on Dual-Use Items to Japan
Client Alert | January 06, 20262026 Colorado Legislative Session Preview
Client Alert | January 06, 2026The Implications of U.S. Action in Venezuela on the Energy and Critical Minerals Sector
Client Alert | January 05, 2026GAO Releases Report on the Importance of Federal Home Loan Banks
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.