Friednash: Ethics commission failed public and politicians in Hickenlooper ruling
Juicy headlines about ethics violations on the eve of the primary election is exactly what the group that filed a complaint against former Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper were hoping for. And the Independent Ethics Commission didn’t disappoint.
Amendment 41 includes a gift ban, limiting the value of something that a public official can accept. In 2018, the gift limit amount was $59. In 2008, former Colorado Supreme Court Justice Jean Dubofsky and I challenged the gift ban provisions of Amendment 41. Our concern was two-fold. First, the measure would chill First Amendment rights. And, it could become a political hunting license to destroy elected officials’ reputations for conduct that wasn’t unethical.
Click here to read the entire article.
TAGS:
Contributors:
Recent Insights
Read MoreCan You Enforce Trade Secrets in “Vibe-Coded” Systems?
Article | June 08, 2026Data Center: Incentives, regulation or continued uncertainty
Client Alert | June 05, 2026It’s Giving … California: An Updated Roadmap for Nevada’s Anti-SLAPP Motion Practice
Client Alert | June 05, 2026USTR Requests Public Comments on the Scope and Nature of the U.S.-China Board of Trade
Client Alert | June 05, 2026Supreme Court Raises Bar for Induced Infringement in ‘Skinny Label’ Generic Case
Client Alert | June 05, 2026Senate Approves DHS Funding, House Set for Final Vote
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.