How the Loper Decision Will Change the Administrative State
The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling overturning Chevron deference has significant implications for many industries. The change in an agency's authority to interpret ambiguous statutes might affect many businesses, especially those in highly regulated sectors. In this episode, members of Brownstein’s legal and policy teams explore the possible consequences of this decision and discuss potential remedies for clients who believe they have been adversely affected by regulatory overreach.
This document is intended to provide you with general information regarding the impacts of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo. The contents of this document are not intended to provide specific legal advice. If you have any questions about the contents of this document or if you need legal advice as to an issue, please contact the attorneys listed or your regular Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP attorney. This communication may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions. This information is accurate as of the publication date.
TAGS:
Contributors:
Recent Insights
Read MoreDerivative and Secondary Liability for Copyright Infringement: Knowledge vs. Control
Client Alert | November 12, 2025Critical Update! USGS Expands Mineral List
Podcast | November 12, 2025Appropriate Timing: End of Shutdown Leads to Government Funding Questions
Client Alert | November 11, 2025Senators Agree on Compromise to End Government Shutdown
Presentation | November 10, 2025Understanding of Withdrawal Liability
Client Alert | November 10, 2025U.S. Expands Critical Minerals Financing and Bilateral Partnerships Under Trump
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.