Insider Betting: Deep Threat or No Harm, No Foul?
With last year’s U.S. Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association declaring the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (“PASPA”) unconstitutional, several states have rushed into the legal sports wagering market. Indeed, some experts estimate that within the next five years, at least 40 states will have legal sports betting in one form or another. While wagering on the outcome of sporting events is obviously not new, the proliferation of legal sports betting in the United States is unprecedented. As with anything new, the rise of legal sports betting has not occurred without a some considerable scrutiny. Some industry opponents and advocates alike have raised concerns about the impact this trend could have not only on the integrity of the underlying sporting events, but on the integrity of sports wagers themselves. One specific concern that some lawmakers and regulators have raised centers around the potential for certain bettors to use “confidential,” “nonpublic,” or “inside” information to gain an unfair advantage when a wager.
Click here to read the entire article.
TAGS:
Contributors:
Recent Insights
Read MoreState of Play
Client Alert | March 17, 2026FTC Seeks Comments on Rental Housing Fees and Negative Option Marketing
Client Alert | March 17, 2026Trump Issues Executive Orders on Mortgage Credit, Housing Construction
Water Blog Post | March 17, 2026SWIS 2026: The Big Signals Shaping Water’s Next Decade
Client Alert | March 17, 2026Revenue Strategies for Central Coast Landowners in Tough Agricultural Times
Presentation | March 17, 2026Navigating PBM Reform & the New Landscape: Implementing Tactics for Improvement
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.