Insider Betting: Deep Threat or No Harm, No Foul?
With last year’s U.S. Supreme Court decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association declaring the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (“PASPA”) unconstitutional, several states have rushed into the legal sports wagering market. Indeed, some experts estimate that within the next five years, at least 40 states will have legal sports betting in one form or another. While wagering on the outcome of sporting events is obviously not new, the proliferation of legal sports betting in the United States is unprecedented. As with anything new, the rise of legal sports betting has not occurred without a some considerable scrutiny. Some industry opponents and advocates alike have raised concerns about the impact this trend could have not only on the integrity of the underlying sporting events, but on the integrity of sports wagers themselves. One specific concern that some lawmakers and regulators have raised centers around the potential for certain bettors to use “confidential,” “nonpublic,” or “inside” information to gain an unfair advantage when a wager.
Click here to read the entire article.
TAGS:
Contributors:
Recent Insights
Read More2026 Colorado Legislative Session Preview
Client Alert | January 06, 2026The Implications of U.S. Action in Venezuela on the Energy and Critical Minerals Sector
Client Alert | January 05, 2026GAO Releases Report on the Importance of Federal Home Loan Banks
Client Alert | January 05, 2026FDA Proposes Incentives for Domestic Drug Development in PDUFA Negotiations
Client Alert | December 23, 2025California’s New Rules for Private Construction Contracts Take Effect Jan. 1, 2026
Client Alert | December 23, 2025Bipartisan Permitting Deal Passes House, Senate Up Next with Speed Bumps Ahead
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.