Landmark Colorado Supreme Court Decision Provides Clarity for Metropolitan Districts
On Monday, the Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion and ruling in UMB Bank v. Landmark Towers Association, 2016SC455, holding that a challenge to the results of a TABOR election brought by a homeowner’s association years after the election took place is subject to, and time barred by, section 1-11-213(4), C.R.S. (2016), which requires an election contest to be filed with a district court no later than 10 days following certification of the election’s results. The case was brought by the homeowner’s association of a condominium development challenging the results of a TABOR election that took place several years ago. The purpose of the election was to form a new metropolitan district that could issue bonds, secured by taxes levied on all owners within the district, to finance new development and infrastructure in the area.
To read the full alert, click the PDF above.
Recent Insights
Read MoreCalifornia’s AB 1050: Removing Barriers to Housing Redevelopment on Commercial Properties
Presentation | December 05, 2025International Considerations in Your Life Sciences IP Due Diligence Review
Presentation | December 05, 2025Vested Rights and Development Agreements
Client Alert | December 04, 2025Risk Assessments Under the New CCPA Regulations Commence Jan. 1, 2026
Article | December 04, 2025Legislative Updates for Planning and Zoning
Client Alert | December 04, 2025Amazon v. Malloy: A Shakeup in NV Wage and Hour Law Results in New Legislation
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.