Ninth Circuit Rejects FOIA Request, Upholds Grand Jury Secrecy in White Collar Case
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently ruled that Exemption 3 of the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) bars disclosure of documents that the federal government possesses because of a grand jury subpoena. While the case involved a FOIA request to the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), the decision is significant for any organization that produces documents in response to a federal grand jury subpoena. It confirms that a range of requesters, including state regulators and plaintiffs’ attorneys, cannot necessarily obtain such documents from DOJ via the FOIA process.
The subject case, Kalbers v. United States Department of Justice, arose from a law professor’s effort to obtain information about the settlement of a criminal case DOJ brought against German automobile manufacturer Volkswagen AG (“VW”) as a result of the “Dieselgate” scandal. The parties resolved the case through a plea agreement, an agreement the professor believed to be a “sweetheart deal.” The professor attempted to use the FOIA process to obtain every document produced by VW during DOJ’s investigation. When DOJ denied the professor’s FOIA request, he sued.
Click here to read the full article.
Contributors:
Recent Insights
Read MoreNinth Circuit Rejects FOIA Request, Upholds Grand Jury Secrecy in White Collar Case
Article | March 31, 2026Extreme candidate’s win in CD1 signals time to end caucuses in Colorado (Opinion)
Article | March 24, 2026Colorado AI law focuses on governance, not gadgets
Client Alert | March 23, 2026Fifth Circuit Refuses to Stay District Court Decision Voiding New HSR Rules
Client Alert | March 20, 2026AI Governance Takes Shape: Breaking Down Washington’s Latest AI Frameworks
Presentation | March 18, 2026State of Play
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.