Referred Question 2M: Modernizing Zoning Exceptions and Variances in Denver
The Denver City Council is asking Denver voters to remove 100-year-old language from the City Charter related to the Board of Adjustment in an effort to modernize zoning exceptions and variances. Real Estate Shareholders Blair Lichtenfels and Zach Siegel bring in land use attorney Caitlin Quander to discuss Referred Question 2M—how it works, what will happen if it passes and its potential impact on the city.
This document is intended to provide you with general information regarding Referred Question 2M in the 2023 Denver municipal election. The contents of this document are not intended to provide specific legal advice. If you have any questions about the contents of this document or if you need legal advice as to an issue, please contact the attorneys listed or your regular Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP attorney. This communication may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions. The information in this article is accurate as of the publication date.
Recent Insights
Read MoreFCC Extends Compliance Deadline for “Revoke All” Rule
Client Alert | January 07, 2026China Strengthens Export Controls on Dual-Use Items to Japan
Client Alert | January 06, 20262026 Colorado Legislative Session Preview
Client Alert | January 06, 2026The Implications of U.S. Action in Venezuela on the Energy and Critical Minerals Sector
Client Alert | January 05, 2026GAO Releases Report on the Importance of Federal Home Loan Banks
Client Alert | January 05, 2026FDA Proposes Incentives for Domestic Drug Development in PDUFA Negotiations
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.