Referred Question 2M: Modernizing Zoning Exceptions and Variances in Denver
The Denver City Council is asking Denver voters to remove 100-year-old language from the City Charter related to the Board of Adjustment in an effort to modernize zoning exceptions and variances. Real Estate Shareholders Blair Lichtenfels and Zach Siegel bring in land use attorney Caitlin Quander to discuss Referred Question 2M—how it works, what will happen if it passes and its potential impact on the city.
This document is intended to provide you with general information regarding Referred Question 2M in the 2023 Denver municipal election. The contents of this document are not intended to provide specific legal advice. If you have any questions about the contents of this document or if you need legal advice as to an issue, please contact the attorneys listed or your regular Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP attorney. This communication may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions. The information in this article is accurate as of the publication date.
Recent Insights
Read MorePresident Trump Delivers 2026 State of the Union
Client Alert | February 24, 2026Proposed Bill Could Reshape Property Tax Liability for Colorado Hotels
Client Alert | February 24, 2026The Supreme Court Held IEEPA Tariffs Are Invalid: Legal Analysis and What’s Next for Businesses
Presentation | February 23, 2026AI is Reshaping the Landscape of International Trade Compliance
Presentation | February 23, 2026Policy Deep Dive – The Federal Tax Landscape: Guidance and Implications for Public Power
Client Alert | February 20, 2026Supreme Court Restricts Presidential Tariff Authority Under IEEPA
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.