Senate Finds Corporate CEO In Contempt of Congress, Refers for Criminal Prosecution
Co-Author, Washington Legal Foundation, Oct. 1, 2024
On September 25, as Congress worked to avert a government shutdown, the United States Senate quietly adopted a resolution on the failure of Steward Health Care’s former Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Ralph de la Torre, to obey a subpoena commanding that he appear before the Senate’s Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (“HELP”). The resolution (S. Res. 837) refers the matter to the U.S. Department of Justice for criminal prosecution. This marks the first time since 1971 that the Senate has voted to hold an individual in criminal contempt and provides an example of the power that Congress can wield in the context of oversight investigations.
Steward Health Care is a large, privately held, for-profit health care system that, at its height, was the largest private hospital system in the U.S., with more than 100 hospitals and other facilities and approximately 40,000 employees. In 2020, a group of physicians, led by de la Torre, took a 90% ownership interest in the company, which was followed, almost immediately, by a series of financial challenges. The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in May 2024.
Click here to read the full article.
Recent Insights
Read MoreThe Sports Gambling Scandals
Client Alert | February 17, 2026SLAPP Fight in Colorado: Plaintiffs Face Dueling Evidentiary Standards
Client Alert | February 17, 2026President Trump’s “America First Arms Transfer Strategy”
Client Alert | February 12, 2026Treasury Finalizes Two Long-Awaited Tribal Tax Rules, Ending Decades of Uncertainty and Ambiguity
Client Alert | February 12, 2026Colorado’s Data Center Dilemma: Carrot or Stick?
Client Alert | February 11, 2026Revenue Drain: CIPA Demand Letters
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.