Senate Finds Corporate CEO In Contempt of Congress, Refers for Criminal Prosecution
Co-Author, Washington Legal Foundation, Oct. 1, 2024
On September 25, as Congress worked to avert a government shutdown, the United States Senate quietly adopted a resolution on the failure of Steward Health Care’s former Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Ralph de la Torre, to obey a subpoena commanding that he appear before the Senate’s Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (“HELP”). The resolution (S. Res. 837) refers the matter to the U.S. Department of Justice for criminal prosecution. This marks the first time since 1971 that the Senate has voted to hold an individual in criminal contempt and provides an example of the power that Congress can wield in the context of oversight investigations.
Steward Health Care is a large, privately held, for-profit health care system that, at its height, was the largest private hospital system in the U.S., with more than 100 hospitals and other facilities and approximately 40,000 employees. In 2020, a group of physicians, led by de la Torre, took a 90% ownership interest in the company, which was followed, almost immediately, by a series of financial challenges. The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in May 2024.
Click here to read the full article.
Recent Insights
Read MoreDissecting Colorado’s Ballot Measure Process
Client Alert | November 14, 2025Employee Benefits-Related Limits for 2026
Client Alert | November 13, 2025CR Signed, Sealed and Delivered: Government Reopens
Presentation | November 13, 2025Industry Knowledge and Software Technology Know-How Needed to Maximize Your Success During Tax Season and Beyond
Presentation | November 13, 2025Retirement and Employment Benefits
Client Alert | November 13, 2025Companies May Be Responsible for the Use of AI in Their Supply Chain Services
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.