Senators Agree on Compromise to End Government Shutdown
On Nov. 10, the Senate voted 60-40 to pass an amended version of H.R.5371 that replaces the House-passed continuing resolution with new language to re-open the government. Sens. Dick Durbin (D-IL), Maggie Hassan (D-NH), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), John Fetterman (D-PA) and Jacky Rosen (D-NV), plus Sen. Angus King (I-ME), joined Republicans in support. The vote comes almost 24 hours after a deal was reached in the Senate to break the weeks long stalemate.
The new terms maintain funding for most federal agencies at current levels through Jan. 30, 2026. The measure further provides fiscal year (FY) 26 appropriations for the Agriculture, Military Construction–Veterans Affairs and Legislative Branch accounts through Sept. 30, 2026. In addition, the bill fully funds Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, prohibits the Trump administration from issuing Reduction in Force (RIF) notices until Jan. 30, 2026, and reverses any RIFs that agencies have implemented since Oct. 1. The deal also requires that federal employees furloughed during the shutdown receive backpay and guarantees a Senate vote on extending expiring Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies sometime in December.
The amended stop gap bill now goes back to the House for re-consideration. Based on initial responses, it appears that the vast majority of House Democrats, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), oppose the Senate’s spending agreement because it fails to extend the ACA credits. “I don’t think that the House Democratic Caucus is prepared to support a promise, a wind and a prayer, from folks who have been devastating the health care of the American people for years,” Minority Leader Jeffries said in a Nov. 9 statement.
This reaction from House Democrats comes days after House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) said he will not promise an ACA vote as part of a shutdown deal. Notably, before the Senate passed the shutdown-ending deal, Senate Republicans rejected an amendment proposed by Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) that would have extended ACA subsidies for one year.
The House is expected to take first votes on the Senate amendment to H.R.5371 on Nov. 12 at 4 p.m. However, air travel delays and cancellations occurring around the United States could make it difficult. Given House Democrats are expected to vote against the Senate-backed deal, Republicans can only afford to lose two votes if all members are present.
THIS DOCUMENT IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE YOU WITH GENERAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE STATUS OF THE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN. THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC LEGAL ADVICE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT OR IF YOU NEED LEGAL ADVICE AS TO AN ISSUE, PLEASE CONTACT THE ATTORNEYS LISTED OR YOUR REGULAR BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP ATTORNEY. THIS COMMUNICATION MAY BE CONSIDERED ADVERTISING IN SOME JURISDICTIONS.
Recent Insights
Read MoreCalifornia’s AB 1050: Removing Barriers to Housing Redevelopment on Commercial Properties
Presentation | December 05, 2025International Considerations in Your Life Sciences IP Due Diligence Review
Presentation | December 05, 2025Vested Rights and Development Agreements
Client Alert | December 04, 2025Risk Assessments Under the New CCPA Regulations Commence Jan. 1, 2026
Article | December 04, 2025Legislative Updates for Planning and Zoning
Client Alert | December 04, 2025Amazon v. Malloy: A Shakeup in NV Wage and Hour Law Results in New Legislation
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.