Telemedicine: Game Changer or Costly Gimmick?
Adoption of telehealth and alternative delivery methods is growing and could alter the health care delivery landscape, but it is still in the early stages. While there are risks that telehealth and alternative delivery methods are not worth the investment or may increase overall health care costs, a thoughtful but full adoption has the potential to improve patient access and health outcomes while greatly reducing health care costs. This Article addresses telehealth and whether it can help fundamentally change the game and achieve the “Triple Aim” of improving individual quality of care, improving population health, and lowering health care costs. Next, it addresses basic systemic challenges to achieving widespread adoption: longstanding health care regulatory laws that prevent more innovative delivery systems from expanding beyond their current “experimental” status, and reimbursement systems that undermine broad adoption, preventing expansion beyond limited niches. Finally, it concludes with a short review of pending legislation that would achieve modest reconciliation of the present conflicting regulations and unleash the telehealth industry for rapid growth.
Click here to read the full article.
Recent Insights
Read MoreChina Tightens Export Declaration Criteria for Machine Tools and Drone‑Related Products
Client Alert | June 11, 2026FCC Enforcement Process Survives Seventh Amendment Challenge
Presentation | June 10, 2026AI-Assisted Innovations: An International Perspective on Patent Eligibility, Inventorship, Prosecution and Enforcement
Presentation | June 10, 2026Trade Secrets, AI and the Hidden Risks of Collaboration in the V2G Ecosystem
Client Alert | June 09, 2026Executive Order Tightens CBP Requirements for U.S. Importers of Record
Client Alert | June 08, 2026Can You Enforce Trade Secrets in “Vibe-Coded” Systems?
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.