The Wire Act Revisited: How the DOJ’s Recent Reinterpretation May Affect Gaming in Nevada
On January 14, 2019, amid the longest-running government shutdown in U.S. history, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) quietly released an opinion that sent shockwaves through the gaming industry. The opinion, dated November 2, 2018, purports to reverse the DOJ’s longstanding interpretation, articulated in its 2011 opinion, that the Wire Act’s prohibitions exclusively apply to interstate gambling activities associated with “sporting events or contests” or, in other words, sports wagering. In stark contrast to the 2011 opinion, the 2018 opinion states that the Wire Act applies to all forms of wagering activity— gambling—that cross state lines. Following the 2011 opinion, numerous states, including Nevada, authorized online gambling in one form or another—online lotteries, online poker and online casino games are now fixtures in multiple jurisdictions across the country. In light of the 2018 opinion, states and industry participants are left to question what the future holds.
Click here to read the entire article.
Recent Insights
Read MoreState of Play
Client Alert | March 17, 2026FTC Seeks Comments on Rental Housing Fees and Negative Option Marketing
Client Alert | March 17, 2026Trump Issues Executive Orders on Mortgage Credit, Housing Construction
Water Blog Post | March 17, 2026SWIS 2026: The Big Signals Shaping Water’s Next Decade
Client Alert | March 17, 2026Revenue Strategies for Central Coast Landowners in Tough Agricultural Times
Presentation | March 17, 2026Navigating PBM Reform & the New Landscape: Implementing Tactics for Improvement
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.