USCIT Denies Preliminary Injunction on IEEPA Tariffs – Why Filing Still Matters
The U.S. Court of International Trade (USCIT) has denied a motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to suspend liquidation of entries subject to tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). While the court emphasized that it has authority to order reliquidation if tariffs are found unlawful, businesses should understand the limitations of the government’s assurances and why filing a lawsuit remains important if you want to preserve your ability to get a tariff refund.
Key Points from the Decision
• The court denied the injunction because plaintiffs could not show irreparable harm.
• The Department of Justice (DOJ) stated it will not contest the court’s authority to order reliquidation, but this is not a guarantee of DOJ support of issuance of refunds.
• Judicial estoppel may prevent the government from reversing its position later, but this does not create an automatic refund process.
What the Government Actually Promised
The government’s concessions in the court’s recent decision may sound reassuring, but they are limited in scope. DOJ only promised not to contest the court’s power to order reliquidation of tariff entries—not that it will agree to refunds without litigation. There is no commitment that the United States will not challenge the right to reliquidation or refund, for example. Unless the Supreme Court addresses this issue directly or a new procedure is established, filing a lawsuit remains the best way to preserve a claim for tariff relief.
Why Filing Still Matters
Without a lawsuit, there is currently no mechanism for a court order requiring Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to reliquidate entries or issue refunds. While the government could create a new process, it does not exist now. Companies should act promptly—waiting until entries are liquidated or finalized may make the path forward more complex.
Questions?
Brownstein is ready to assist with filing lawsuits, compliance strategies and refund preparation. Contact us today to protect your rights and secure potential tariff relief.
THIS DOCUMENT IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE YOU WITH GENERAL INFORMATION REGARDING A RULING ON IEEPA TARIFFS BY USCIT THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC LEGAL ADVICE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT OR IF YOU NEED LEGAL ADVICE AS TO AN ISSUE, PLEASE CONTACT THE ATTORNEYS LISTED OR YOUR REGULAR BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP ATTORNEY. THIS COMMUNICATION MAY BE CONSIDERED ADVERTISING IN SOME JURISDICTIONS.
Recent Insights
Read MoreGAO Releases Report on the Importance of Federal Home Loan Banks
Client Alert | January 05, 2026FDA Proposes Incentives for Domestic Drug Development in PDUFA Negotiations
Client Alert | December 23, 2025California’s New Rules for Private Construction Contracts Take Effect Jan. 1, 2026
Client Alert | December 23, 2025Bipartisan Permitting Deal Passes House, Senate Up Next with Speed Bumps Ahead
Client Alert | December 19, 2025President Trump Accelerates Marijuana Rescheduling and Expands Access to CBD
Article | December 18, 2025Will California Cities Rise to the Housing Challenge in 2026?
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.