Utilizing 6th Circ.’s Expanded Internal Investigation Protection
A recent federal appellate court decision demonstrates one way that businesses can use a very limited showing to protect internal investigations from discovery in commercial litigation.
In reversing a district court decision to force disclosure, a unanimous U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit panel led by Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Jeffrey Sutton in In re: FirstEnergy Corp. observed on Aug. 7 that “[w]hat matters for attorney-client privilege is not what a company does with its legal advice, but simply whether a company seeks legal advice.” Similarly, the court found work-product protection based only on circumstantial evidence of anticipated litigation.
Savvy clients looking to protect internal investigations can use this precedent to their advantage, while those looking to force production will need to employ a carefully calibrated approach.
Click here to read the full article.
TAGS:
Contributors:
Recent Insights
Read MoreEquity in Action: Embedding Justice in Land Use Decisions
Article | March 09, 2026Tina Peters clemency? Her sentence was drastically harsher than those of two Democratic lawmakers (Opinion)
Client Alert | March 06, 202630 Races, 11 Open Seats: What to Watch During the 2026 State AG Elections
Presentation | March 06, 2026Public Policy, Legislative Issues and the Upcoming Elections
Client Alert | March 06, 2026Ballot Box Rezoning Coming to Denver?
Presentation | March 05, 2026M&A in AEC: The Advisors You Can’t Do Without
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.