The Wire Act Revisited: How the DOJ’s Recent Reinterpretation May Affect Gaming in Nevada
On January 14, 2019, amid the longest-running government shutdown in U.S. history, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) quietly released an opinion that sent shockwaves through the gaming industry. The opinion, dated November 2, 2018, purports to reverse the DOJ’s longstanding interpretation, articulated in its 2011 opinion, that the Wire Act’s prohibitions exclusively apply to interstate gambling activities associated with “sporting events or contests” or, in other words, sports wagering. In stark contrast to the 2011 opinion, the 2018 opinion states that the Wire Act applies to all forms of wagering activity— gambling—that cross state lines. Following the 2011 opinion, numerous states, including Nevada, authorized online gambling in one form or another—online lotteries, online poker and online casino games are now fixtures in multiple jurisdictions across the country. In light of the 2018 opinion, states and industry participants are left to question what the future holds.
Click here to read the entire article.
Recent Insights
Read MoreFDA FY ’27 Budget Proposes Broad New Authorities and Reforms Across Food, Drugs and Medical Devices
Presentation | April 09, 2026Willful Infringement and Enhanced Damages, Current Trends to Inform your Damages Case
Client Alert | April 07, 2026Trump Admin Adjusts Tariffs for “Derivative Products” Containing Steel, Aluminum and Copper
Client Alert | April 03, 2026Critical Minerals Take Center Stage in Trump’s FY27 Budget Request
Client Alert | April 03, 2026Bulked-Up Defense, Slimmed-Down Domestic: Inside the FY 2027 Skinny Budget
Client Alert | April 03, 2026Trump Administration Announces Section 232 Tariffs on Pharmaceuticals
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.