Public Meetings in the Front Range During the Covid-19 Outbreak
Throughout Colorado, public meetings of virtually all types are being disrupted by the outbreak of COVID-19. In light of the state’s restrictions on public gatherings, many local governments in the Front Range have had to work quickly to develop procedures to shift from in-person meetings to virtual meetings, adopting emergency ordinances and resolutions, and otherwise establishing new procedures. Other quasi-governmental entities, such as urban renewal authorities, business improvement districts and metropolitan districts also have switched from in-person meetings to virtual meetings.
Virtual meetings raise a variety of potential new issues, including technical glitches and susceptibility to hacking. Virtual meetings also could create constitutional due process issues in certain instances where a right to be heard is a key component of the process, such as quasi‑judicial matters. In such instances, a risk exists that either an applicant or a member of the public could claim their due process rights were violated because the alternative or virtual means of participating were not adequate or meaningful. Under normal circumstances, a member of the public who did not have access to a computer or the internet could participate in a virtual meeting by visiting their local library. But in the current situation, most libraries are also closed to in-person visits by the public. Because the COVID-19 outbreak has restricted peoples’ ability to participate in public hearings, some local governments are allowing alternative methods of comment to ensure that the public has adequate and meaningful means of participation. These alternative methods of comment are in addition to the typical methods of public comment like mail and email.
In light of the concerns raised by virtual meetings, local governments in the Front Range have taken four different types of approaches to hearing quasi‑judicial matters: (1) postpone all quasi‑judicial matters until an in-person meeting can be held; (2) proceed with quasi-judicial matters with consent of the applicant; (3) proceed with quasi‑judicial matters with applicant’s consent so long as the applicant agrees to waive future legal challenges; and (4) proceed with quasi-judicial matters as scheduled.
This client alert summarizes the approach of many of the local governments in the Front Range as to public meetings during the COVID-19 outbreak. All data is based on self‑reporting by the municipalities. Other organizations, such as the Colorado Attorney General’s Office, the Colorado Municipal League and Colorado Counties, Inc. also provide guidance and summaries on how local governments should and are proceeding with public meetings during the COVID-19 outbreak.
Click here to read more Brownstein alerts on the legal issues the coronavirus threat raises for businesses.
| Jurisdiction | Website and Source of Authority | Key Points |
| Adams County | Source of Authority: Order Declaring a Disaster in and for Adams County, Colorado |
|
| Arapahoe County | Source of Authority: Resolution No. 200110 |
|
| Arvada | Source of Authority: Code of the City of Arvada, Colorado § 26‑41, Resolution No. R30-032
|
|
| Aurora |
Source of Authority: City Council Resolution No. R 2020-24 |
|
| Boulder | Source of Authority: Ordinance 8391 |
|
| Boulder County | Source of Authority: Resolution 2020-24 |
|
| Brighton | Source of Authority: Emergency Electronic Participation Policy During Regular and Special City Council Meetings |
|
| City and County of Broomfield |
Source of Authority: Resolution 2020‑108 |
|
| Castle Rock |
Source of Authority: Resolution 2020-040; Town Council Meeting Special Procedures During Declared Disasters |
|
| Centennial | Source of Authority: Resolution 2020-R-12 |
|
| Cherry Hills Village | Source of Authority: Resolution 8 |
|
| Colorado Springs | Source of Authority: Resolution 19-20 |
|
| Commerce City | Source of Authority: Emergency Ordinance |
|
| City and County of Denver | Source of Authority: Emergency Rules of Procedure |
|
| Douglas County | Source of Authority: Local Disaster Emergency Declaration |
|
| Englewood | Source of Authority: CB-12; Emergency Preparedness/City Council Meeting Participation Policy
|
|
| Erie | Source of Authority: Resolution 20-210; Remote Meeting Policy |
|
| Federal Heights | Source of Authority: Resolution 20-14 |
|
| Fort Collins | Source of Authority: Emergency Ordinance 061, 2020 |
|
| Glendale | Source of Authority: Emergency Ordinance
|
|
| Golden | Source of Authority: Electronic Participation Rules |
|
| Greenwood Village | Source of Authority: Resolutions 2020-18, 2020-19 |
|
| Jefferson County | Source of Authority: Resolution CC20-055, Public Health Order 20‑001 |
|
| Lafayette | Source of Authority: Resolutions 2020-24, 2020-25 |
|
| Lakewood | Source of Authority: Motion to extend Proclamation issued by City Manager |
|
| Littleton | Source of Authority: Legislative Rules (amended 3/20/2020) |
|
| Lone Tree | Source of Authority: City Council Adopted Policy 20-01 |
|
| Longmont | Source of Authority: Longmont, Colorado Code of Ordinances § 2.20.125 |
|
| Louisville | Source of Authority: Resolution Nos. 26, 27, 30 |
|
| Northglenn | Source of Authority: Resolution CR-120 |
|
| Parker | Source of Authority: Ordinance No. 1.352.1., Series of 2020 |
|
| Superior | Source of Authority: Resolution No. R-24 Series 2020, Town of Superior Remote Meeting Policy |
|
| Thornton | Source of Authority: Thornton, Colorado Code of Ordinances § 4.23 |
|
| Westminster | Source of Authority: Resolution 4021 |
|
| Wheat Ridge | Source of Authority: How to Participate in Virtual City Meetings |
|
Information is changing daily and some of the content included in this alert may have changed or been updated since publication.
This document is intended to provide you with general information regarding public hearings in Colorado during the COVID-19 pandemic. The contents of this document are not intended to provide specific legal advice. If you have any questions about the contents of this document or if you need legal advice as to an issue, please contact the attorneys listed or your regular Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP attorney. This communication may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions.
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.