No matter what the type of organization, playing an active role in the political decision-making process and policy formation is no longer a luxury—it is an imperative.
On June 3, 2019, a federal court in New Hampshire issued a highly anticipated decision in New Hampshire Lottery Commission et al. v. Barr et al.
A member of the Intellectual Property & Technology Group, Peter Nagle’s experience includes patent preparation and prosecution, patent strategy and post grant proceedings for medical devices, electronic vehicles, automated systems, video and audio streaming, user interfaces, automated speech recognition, intelligent automated assistants, optics, HVAC and general computer software.
Prior to joining the firm, Peter was an associate at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius in Palo Alto, California. He also worked as a patent law intern for the Glenn Patent Group in Menlo Park, California. Prior to his career in law, Peter was an applications engineer at Power and Controls Automation in Tampa, Florida, where he developed computer programs for controlling automated manufacturing machinery and mining equipment.
Brownstein Adds Six New Associates, New Policy Analyst
Article I and the First Inventor to File: Patent Reform or Doublespeak?Co-author, 50 IDEA 441, January 2010
Editor-in-Chief, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2009-2010