Another Year, Another Full Slate of Housing Bills in California
On Thursday, Sept. 19, Gov. Newsom signed a package of housing bills designed to address the housing crisis affecting California. Below is a brief summary of key bills. Check back here as we will be providing more detailed analysis of several of these bills.
|
|
| |||
|
|
Ends local agencies’ claims that they “self-certified” their housing elements to avoid the Builder’s Remedy | |||
|
|
Supplements protections for all housing projects by further limiting local agencies’ actions that delay or effectively deny housing projects | |||
|
| ||||
|
Requires that an applicant’s written notice requesting CEQA exemption be posted on the local agency’s website | ||||
|
| ||||
|
Adds legislative findings that undermine a recent trial court ruling that found SB 9 does not apply in certain charter cities | ||||
|
|
Allows for streamlined approval on sites up to 100 acres for the redevelopment of regional malls, as defined Imposes additional health and safety requirements for developments within 500 feet of a freeway | |||
|
|
Makes this exemption inapplicable to a project that may cause substantial adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources | |||
|
|
Revises the exemption to require that the site be identified for housing in the most recent long-range development plan EIR; relaxes several conditions for qualifying for the exemption | |||
|
|
Clarifies provisions in SB 684 to ensure that different homeownership types (e.g., tenancies in common and community land trusts) and builders are eligible to use the bill | |||
|
| ||||
|
|
| |||
|
|
Applies retroactively to qualifying projects starting Jan. 1, 2025 | |||
|
|
| |||
|
Applies to 100% affordable projects, projects of 10 units or fewer, and projects that utilize Density Bonus Law | ||||
|
|
Prohibits a local agency, with some limited exceptions, from imposing a land dedication requirement to widen a roadway |
This document is intended to provide you with general information regarding housing bills from the most recent California legislative session. The contents of this document are not intended to provide specific legal advice. If you have any questions about the contents of this document or if you need legal advice as to an issue, please contact the attorneys listed or your regular Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP attorney. This communication may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions. The information in this article is accurate as of the publication date. Because the law in this area is changing rapidly, and insights are not automatically updated, continued accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.