California’s New Requirements for Buyer-Broker Representation Agreements
As of Jan. 1, 2025, California law mandates a written buyer-broker representation agreement for buyer’s brokers to receive a commission in real property sales. The new law applies to sales of all property types, including office, retail, industrial, multifamily and single-family properties. The new law does not apply to leases, rental agreements, state and federal land or loan brokerage services.
The new mandates are the result of Assembly Bill 2992, which was introduced in response to the Burnett Spitzer antitrust lawsuit against the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and certain brokerages, which led to a substantial settlement over commission-sharing practices. The settlement required real estate licensees to have a written agreement with a buyer before showing properties listed on the Multiple Listing Service (MLS). AB 2992 expands this requirement to all properties, whether it is listed on an MLS or not, and also imposes several additional requirements.
Key Provisions of AB 2992
Compensation: The bill mandates that compensation be clearly defined in the agreement, but it does not require the buyer to directly pay it, meaning the buyer’s broker may still get paid by the seller either directly or through the seller’s broker. The agreement can specify compensation as a percentage, fixed fee or hourly rate, as agreed upon by the parties.
Enforcement: The bill provides that a person licensed pursuant to Division 4 (commencing with Section 10000) of the Business and Professions Code who violates the new law shall be deemed to have violated that person’s licensing law. Accordingly, noncompliance may lead to disciplinary action from the Department of Real Estate.
Implications for Buyers and Agents
AB 2992 is intended to benefit both consumers and real estate professionals by creating a more transparent and accountable market. By expanding protections beyond MLS-listed properties and extending the requirements to all real estate licensees, the law ensures a consistent standard of care. Additionally, the three-month limit on agreements is likely to foster ongoing communication and active engagement between agents and their clients, creating stronger and more effective partnerships.
Brokers should consult with legal counsel on compliance and updating procedures, practices and forms. Given that noncompliance with certain of the new law’s requirements could lead to rescission and potential licensing law violations, brokers are well-advised to carefully review the new law to avoid liability.
THIS DOCUMENT IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE YOU WITH GENERAL INFORMATION REGARDING CALIFORNIA’S NEW REQUIREMENTS FOR BUYER-BROKER REPRESENTATION AGREEMENTS. THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE SPECIFIC LEGAL ADVICE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT OR IF YOU NEED LEGAL ADVICE AS TO AN ISSUE, PLEASE CONTACT THE ATTORNEYS LISTED OR YOUR REGULAR BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP ATTORNEY. THIS COMMUNICATION MAY BE CONSIDERED ADVERTISING IN SOME JURISDICTIONS.
Recent Insights
Read MoreWhat to Expect From the 2026 Wyoming Legislative Session
Client Alert | January 23, 2026Workplace Safety Obligations at the Edge of the First Amendment
Client Alert | January 23, 2026Diverging Paths on Health Care Affordability: Inside the White House and Congressional GOP Plans
Client Alert | January 23, 2026Appropriate Timing: Appropriations Legislation Enters the Home Stretch
Client Alert | January 23, 2026Trump Issues Executive Order on Institutional Investor Purchases of Single-Family Homes
Client Alert | January 22, 2026What to Know about Maryland’s 2026 Legislative Session
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.