The governor’s 2025-26 budget proposal breaks the cycle of deficits past with a cautiously optimistic projection of a $322.2 million surplus. The source of this modest surplus, which comes as a great surprise to many still reeling from the $37.9 billion shortfall initially projected this time last year, is allegedly in part due to a successful implementation of the governor’s two-year budget framework approach. This surplus differs from the projections released by the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO), who estimated a deficit of $2.2 billion, which the governor claims to have accounted for in adjustments to Proposition 98 and the Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties (SFEU). In other words, California has purportedly balanced their budget so successfully that the expected deficit has not only been closed but has been replaced with a small surplus.
Click here for the full analysis.
This document is intended to provide you with general information regarding the 2025-26 California state budget. The contents of this document are not intended to provide specific legal advice. If you have any questions about the contents of this document or if you need legal advice as to an issue, please contact the attorneys listed or your regular Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP attorney. This communication may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions. The information in this article is accurate as of the publication date. Because the law in this area is changing rapidly, and insights are not automatically updated, continued accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
Recent Insights
Read More2026: New Year, New Laws for California Employers
Client Alert | December 12, 2025Trump Administration Issues EO Advancing Federal Preemption of AI Laws
Client Alert | December 10, 2025What to Watch During the Florida 2026 Legislative Session
Client Alert | December 10, 2025What Out-of-State Developers Need to Know Before Building in Southern Nevada
Client Alert | December 09, 2025November 2025 Tax Regulatory Update
Client Alert | December 09, 2025Administrative Adjudication Appeal May Waive Seventh Amendment Right to Jury Trial
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.