Fed. Circ. Data Patent Opinion Elucidates Software Eligibility
On Nov. 15, in Koninklijke KPN NV v. Gemalto M2M GmbH, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed an ineligibility finding under Title 35 U.S. Code Section 101 by U.S. District Judge Leonard Stark of the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. Judge Stark had granted the defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) and found that claims 1-4 of U.S. Patent No. 6,212,662 were patent ineligible under Section 101.
Click here to read the entire article.
TAGS:
Contributors:
Recent Insights
Read MoreSupreme Court Restricts Presidential Tariff Authority Under IEEPA
Presentation | February 19, 2026The Sports Gambling Scandals
Client Alert | February 17, 2026SLAPP Fight in Colorado: Plaintiffs Face Dueling Evidentiary Standards
Client Alert | February 17, 2026President Trump’s “America First Arms Transfer Strategy”
Client Alert | February 12, 2026Treasury Finalizes Two Long-Awaited Tribal Tax Rules, Ending Decades of Uncertainty and Ambiguity
Client Alert | February 12, 2026Colorado’s Data Center Dilemma: Carrot or Stick?
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.