Judicial Council of California Ends Statewide Eviction Moratorium Memento Mori
On Aug. 13, 2020, the Judicial Council of California voted to end two temporary emergency rules governing evictions and judicial foreclosures. These rules suspended both residential and commercial eviction actions by disallowing courts to issue summons on complaints for eviction unless the court found that the action was necessary to protect public health and safety.
The Judicial Council had originally stated that its emergency rules would stay in place until 90 days after Gov. Gavin Newsom lifts the state of emergency or until the Judicial Council amends or repeals the rule. The Judicial Council’s vote is an effective repeal of its rule and is set to take effect on Sept. 1, 2020.
At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, renters were protected from eviction through state executive orders, local ordinances and the Judicial Council’s rules. However, this vote mitigates some protections renters once held. Renters will no longer be protected by the Judicial Council’s measures to postpone the displacement of renters who have failed to pay rent or are otherwise in default after Sept. 1, 2020.
Without protection from the Judicial Council, renters can only be protected by state and local ordinances. Presently, over 100 counties and cities have enacted stronger renter protections. Thus, before proceeding with an eviction action, landlords should check their local ordinances to determine whether any protections for renters are in place.
In addition to reviewing local ordinances, landlords should monitor whether Gov. Newsom and/or local lawmakers issue new orders to prevent renters from being evicted. Indeed, Gov. Newsom has said he is working to extend statewide protections for renters. The California Legislature has proposed AB-1436, legislation that seeks to address protections for renters. Therefore, although the Judicial Council’s rule certainly benefits landlords, landlords may still be unable to proceed with eviction actions.
What Should Landlords Do?
- Wait until after Sept. 1, 2020 before filing an unlawful detainer action;
- Diligently research whether local ordinances protect renters from being evicted;
- Monitor whether Gov. Newsom issues a new executive order that provides renters protection from being evicted;
- Monitor whether their local lawmakers enact new protections in light of the Judicial Council of California’s ruling; and
- Consult local counsel to appropriately investigate creative solutions including lease restructuring or to determine alternative remedies to eviction if an unlawful detainer action remains inadequate.
This document is intended to provide you with general information regarding California's eviction moratorium. The contents of this document are not intended to provide specific legal advice. If you have any questions about the contents of this document or if you need legal advice as to an issue, please contact the attorneys listed or your regular Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP attorney. This communication may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions. The information in this article is accurate as of the publication date. Because the law in this area is changing rapidly, and insights are not automatically updated, continued accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
TAGS:
Contributors:
Recent Insights
Read MoreFDA FY ’27 Budget Proposes Broad New Authorities and Reforms Across Food, Drugs and Medical Devices
Presentation | April 09, 2026Willful Infringement and Enhanced Damages, Current Trends to Inform your Damages Case
Client Alert | April 07, 2026Trump Admin Adjusts Tariffs for “Derivative Products” Containing Steel, Aluminum and Copper
Client Alert | April 03, 2026Critical Minerals Take Center Stage in Trump’s FY27 Budget Request
Client Alert | April 03, 2026Bulked-Up Defense, Slimmed-Down Domestic: Inside the FY 2027 Skinny Budget
Client Alert | April 03, 2026Trump Administration Announces Section 232 Tariffs on Pharmaceuticals
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.