Ready, Set, Go: Virginia State AG Election Kicks Off Competitive Election Season
Last night’s state attorney general (AG) election in Virginia marks the first major test of the parties’ political strength heading into the 2026 election cycle. At the end of this highly anticipated race, Democrats were able to flip the state, giving them momentum heading into 2026. In addition, Democrats preserved the appointed AG seat in New Jersey.
Virginia’s off-year contest has often served as an early indicator of voter sentiment and helped shape expectations for the following year’s races. While it is too early to determine where the political winds will ultimately go, there was one certainty to come out of last night’s race: next year will be closely watched and highly competitive. With over 30 state attorneys general races in 2026 and at least 17 AG offices sure to have changeover due to term limits or the current AG running for a different office, next year’s outcomes will most certainly impact this increasingly competitive political landscape.
Election Results
Virginia
In Virginia, the incumbent Attorney General Jason Miyares (R) was challenged by former state legislative House Delegate Jay Jones (D). In recent weeks, the race garnered national attention with both parties spending tens of millions of dollars in the race.
- Winner: Jay Jones (D)
- Vote Margin: 53.1%-46.5%
- Partisan Shift: Republican → Democrat
Initial Implications: With the Democratic challenger unseating the incumbent Republican AG, we can likely anticipate a shift in priorities toward price transparency, housing discrimination and increased scrutiny on competitive practices, among other things. We can also likely anticipate an additional Democrat joining multistate litigation on certain issues, including pushing back on actions taken by the Trump administration.
New Jersey
Because New Jersey’s AG is appointed, eyes were on the outcome of the governor’s race. Since Gov. Phil Murphy is term-limited, this was an open contest and a new governor will appoint an AG regardless of the election outcome. That said, the Democratic candidate Mikie Sherril defeated the Republican candidate Jack Ciattarelli by a vote of 56.2%-43.2%, keeping control of the New Jersey AG’s office with the Democrats.
Initial Implications: There has been no indication as to who the governor-elect will appoint as attorney general, including whether she will ask current AG Matthew Platkin to serve again. Whether she retains AG Platkin or appoints someone new, we don’t anticipate that the policies or priorities of the New Jersey AG’s office will change significantly.
Brownstein’s state AG team will continue to monitor transition announcements and provide updates as new AG leadership structures and policy directions are confirmed.
This document is intended to provide you with general information regarding the results of attorneys general races. The contents of this document are not intended to provide specific legal advice. If you have any questions about the contents of this document or if you need legal advice as to an issue, please contact the attorneys listed or your regular Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP attorney. This communication may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions. The information in this article is accurate as of the publication date. Because the law in this area is changing rapidly, and insights are not automatically updated, continued accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
Contributors:
Recent Insights
Read MoreSenators Agree on Compromise to End Government Shutdown
Presentation | November 10, 2025Understanding of Withdrawal Liability
Client Alert | November 10, 2025U.S. Expands Critical Minerals Financing and Bilateral Partnerships Under Trump
Client Alert | November 06, 2025Election 2025: Pennsylvania Judicial Retention
Client Alert | November 06, 2025Election 2025: California’s Prop 50 Passes
Client Alert | November 06, 2025Election 2025: What to Watch From Other Notable Races
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.