Three Ways to Prevent Corporate Espionage

Corporate espionage has become one of the most significant threats to enterprise value in today’s data-driven economy. In recent years, allegations of trade-secret theft and insider leaks have disrupted funding rounds, delayed public offerings and triggered parallel criminal and civil investigations across multiple jurisdictions.

As competition intensifies around artificial intelligence (AI), advanced manufacturing and life-science innovation, companies must treat trade-secret protection as both a legal and operational imperative. The following three strategies represent best practices for mitigating espionage risk and preserving the value of proprietary IP assets.

1. Build a Zero-Trust IP Perimeter

Traditional network security models that rely on single-layer authentication are no longer sufficient to protect sensitive intellectual property. A zero-trust architecture assumes that every user, device and application is a potential risk until verified.

Companies should deploy multilayer encryption, access analytics and dynamic authentication tied to job roles. Automated data-labeling tools can classify trade-secret materials—such as source code, formulations, algorithms and CAD files—so that they are continuously tracked and protected even when copied or transferred between systems.

By embedding protection into the infrastructure rather than relying on user discretion, organizations create an auditable record of compliance and significantly reduce the likelihood of undetected exfiltration.

2. Establish Human Firewalls Through Employment and Vendor Controls

Most trade-secret losses originate from insiders or contractors with legitimate access. A robust compliance program must therefore extend beyond technology to the human element.

Key steps include:

• Integrating confidentiality and invention-assignment provisions into every employment and vendor agreement.
• Conducting IP onboarding and offboarding sessions to identify confidential materials and reinforce ownership obligations.
• Using digital watermarks or metadata tagging to trace the origin of critical documents.
• Periodically auditing third-party access to ensure compliance with nondisclosure and use-limitation clauses.

Documented implementation of these measures strengthens a company’s ability to demonstrate “reasonable efforts” to protect its secrets under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) and corresponding state laws.

3. Integrate AI-Driven Surveillance and Rapid Legal Response Protocols

Artificial intelligence now enables both intrusion and defense. Companies can leverage AI-based monitoring systems to detect unusual network activity, unauthorized downloads or atypical data-transfer patterns that may indicate insider theft.

When an incident is detected, time is critical. Organizations should maintain preapproved legal escalation plans that include litigation holds, forensic imaging rights and pre-drafted cease-and-desist templates. These steps allow immediate response before stolen data can be replicated, reimplemented or monetized by competitors.

Bottom Line

Corporate espionage risks are no longer isolated to defense contractors or high-tech laboratories. Every company that handles proprietary data, algorithms or process know-how faces potential exposure. By combining zero-trust infrastructure, contractual discipline and AI-enhanced detection, businesses can deter espionage, demonstrate legal diligence and preserve enterprise value.

For more information on designing or auditing trade-secret protection programs, please contact Brownstein’s Intellectual Property Group.

---

This document is intended to provide you with general information regarding corporate espionage and measures to prevent it. The contents of this document are not intended to provide specific legal advice. If you have any questions about the contents of this document or if you need legal advice as to an issue, please contact the attorneys listed or your regular Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP attorney. This communication may be considered advertising in some jurisdictions. The information in this article is accurate as of the publication date. Because the law in this area is changing rapidly, and insights are not automatically updated, continued accuracy cannot be guaranteed.