Delaware Court of Chancery Decision Applies Duty of Oversight Liability to Corporate Officers
Author, Washington Legal Foundation, Feb. 7, 2023
In a case of first impression, the Delaware Court of Chancery recently clarified that, like corporate directors, corporate officers owe a duty of oversight to the corporation. In re McDonald’s Corporation Stockholder Derivative Litigation, 2023 WL 407668 (Del. Ch. Jan. 25, 2023). This is the first time that a Delaware court has explicitly found that the same duty articulated in the 1996 Caremark decision concerning directors applies equally to officers. Indeed, the court went so far as to opine that “the same policies that motivated [the Caremark court] to recognize the duty of oversight for directors apply equally, if not to a greater degree, to officers.” However, the court also confirmed that corporate officers, like corporate directors, breach this duty only when their conduct “takes the form of bad faith.”
Click here to read the full article.
Contributors:
Recent Insights
Read MoreFDA FY ’27 Budget Proposes Broad New Authorities and Reforms Across Food, Drugs and Medical Devices
Presentation | April 09, 2026Willful Infringement and Enhanced Damages, Current Trends to Inform your Damages Case
Client Alert | April 07, 2026Trump Admin Adjusts Tariffs for “Derivative Products” Containing Steel, Aluminum and Copper
Client Alert | April 03, 2026Critical Minerals Take Center Stage in Trump’s FY27 Budget Request
Client Alert | April 03, 2026Bulked-Up Defense, Slimmed-Down Domestic: Inside the FY 2027 Skinny Budget
Client Alert | April 03, 2026Trump Administration Announces Section 232 Tariffs on Pharmaceuticals
You have chosen to send an email to Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck or one of its lawyers. The sending and receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create and attorney-client relationship between us.
If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers.
If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you and even to use the information you submit to us against you.
I have read this and want to send an email.